Site search
sponsored by
Glenwood Springs, Colorado | Post Independent
 
Glenwood Springs, Colorado | Post Independent
Send us your news
<< back
Thursday, October 5, 2006

Beauprez and Ritter face off in Rifle

Potential governors point to their rural backgrounds

Republican gubernatorial candidate Bob Beauprez reacts to Democrat gubernatorial candidate Bill Ritter during Wednesday night's debate at Rifle High School.
Republican gubernatorial candidate Bob Beauprez reacts to Democrat gubernatorial candidate Bill Ritter during Wednesday night's debate at Rifle High School.ENLARGE
Republican gubernatorial candidate Bob Beauprez reacts to Democrat gubernatorial candidate Bill Ritter during Wednesday night's debate at Rifle High School.
Post Independent/Kara K. Pearson
Rifle High School student Becca Ketelsleger shakes hands with Democratic candidate Bill Ritter as she waits for a ride after school. Ritter debated Republican candidate Bob Beauprez Wednesday night at RHS.
Rifle High School student Becca Ketelsleger shakes hands with Democratic candidate Bill Ritter as she waits for a ride after school. Ritter debated Republican candidate Bob Beauprez Wednesday night at RHS.ENLARGE
Rifle High School student Becca Ketelsleger shakes hands with Democratic candidate Bill Ritter as she waits for a ride after school. Ritter debated Republican candidate Bob Beauprez Wednesday night at RHS.
Post Independent/Kara K. Pearson

RIFLE, Colo. — Gubernatorial candidates Bob Beauprez and Bill Ritter faced off over energy issues in Rifle Wednesday. Hosted by the Associated Governments of Northwestern Colorado and moderated by local radio newsman Ron Milhorn, the candidates answered prepared questions in front of an audience that only filled about two thirds of the Rifle High School auditorium. No questions were taken from the audience.

The candidates agreed on several of the issues presented to them. Both harped on their rural roots as proof they had the background to understand the challenges facing small towns on the West Slope. They agreed oil and gas development continues to have significant impact on both the economy and the environment in western Garfield County. And they agreed development needs to be balanced with protection of the land.

"We need to understand the energy economy absolutely needs to go forward," Ritter said. "But it should go forward in a responsible way."

The change brought to western Colorado by energy development "is tough to manage. You have two choices, you can manage it or it can manage you," Beauprez said. Development needs to be managed with "common sense so as to preserve and protect this place we call home."

Beauprez, a Republican, and Ritter, a Democrat, had little disagreement over where mineral severance tax - which is paid by oil and gas and coal companies and goes back to counties where mining takes place as energy impact grants - should not be siphoned off to pay for local government projects in other parts of the state.

But when asked if the tax rate should be raised Beauprez said, "Hell no. I'd protect the dollars that are rightfully yours."

Ritter said he'd leave the question open and have a dialogue with industry and local government to determine if revenues are adequately covering impacts. He also said gas development is having an effect on other counties such as Weld and La Plata who should also get their fair share.

Ritter took aim at Beauprez at one point, saying he had been named to the "Dirty Dozen List" of the League of Conservative Voters for his poor voting record on environmental issues, citing his plan to enhance wildlife habitat as mitigation for oil and gas development.



"I disagree with it. You can't change migration patterns by telling the elk to go to another place," he said, getting a laugh from the audience.

In answer to a question about how they would take care of repairs to local roads feeling the effects of increased traffic from gas development, each had a different approach. Beauprez said he would scrap a 22.5 percent gas tax in favor of a .77 cent sales tax that would "replace dollar for dollar the transportation tax we've got now."

Ritter disagreed. "A sales tax is a really bad idea," that would affect the poor and retailers.

They also diverged on the issue of split estate. In much of western Garfield County, minerals are owned separately from the surface of the land. By law energy companies can access private land to develop the subsurface minerals. Many landowners in western Garfield County have seen unwanted developments on their land because of the law.

Ritter said he was committed to finding a way to pass legislation, which has failed in previous attempts, to provide compensation for land owners who have their land impacted by development.

Beauprez said the present system is working.

"I've had experience with split estate on land we own ... that worked out very well for us. I know there's conflict there ... and I will lead the effort to get interested parties to the table," he said.

Both Beauprez and Ritter had good words to say about former state legislator and Rifle resident Russell George who heads up the Department of Natural Resources (DNR). Asked how they would staff DNR, which oversees oil and gas development through its Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation Commission, both men said George should stay on.

"I have a lot of respect for Russ George. We've had a good working relationship and he's done a lot of good things for the state," Ritter said.

Beauprez was even more emphatic. "Russ George is one of the best minds we have in Colorado. If he wants a job in my administration he can have one."

In their final statements, Ritter and Beauprez reiterated their campaign themes and took a couple well-aimed swipes at each other. For Beauprez the key words were government experience and cracking down on illegal immigrants. He also blasted his opponent's record as Denver District Attorney for reducing felony charges against illegal aliens.

Ritter called on the voters to look at Beauprez's voting record as Congressman for the Seventh District in supporting the 2005 Energy Policy Act that calls for fast-tracking drilling permits and oil shale development.

"We're giving the federal government less time to consider environmental impacts, that's just the wrong thing to do in terms of what's in the best interest of the people of this state."



Contact Donna Gray: 384-9115, ext. 16605

dgray@postindependent.com


facebook Print
Ads by Google
Comments
Previous Guide Line
Next Guide Line
Sort comments by:
downloading content