Club 20 opposes state water bonds
GRAND JUNCTION, Colo. (AP) – A committee of the influential Western Slope lobbying group Club 20 voted overwhelmingly on Monday to recommend that voters defeat a proposal for up to $2 billion in bonds for water projects.
The Club 20 Natural Resource Committee voted 20-5 for a resolution opposing a referendum on the November ballot authorizing the bonds.
Club 20, which represents 22 counties and two Ute Indian tribes, lobbies state government on Western Slope issues. Its members include legislators, other elected officials and business people.
Club 20’s board of directors will take up the water bond resolution on Sept. 5, although club President Reeves Brown said in June the group wouldn’t take a position.
Members of the Natural Resource Committee faulted the referendum for not specifying what projects the bonds would finance and not offering help for communities that might be hurt by water projects.
They also expressed concerns about the money being spent to benefit primarily the Front Range.
The referendum, prompted by a severe drought that culminated in the state’s driest year on record last year, calls for the projects to be chosen by the state Water Conservation Board and approved by the governor.
Greg Walcher, director of the Department of Natural Resources and a former president of Club 20, tried to reassure the committee by saying six of the Water Conservation Board’s nine voting members are from rural areas and have Western Slope ties.
Walcher argued that the referendum was vital to protect against future droughts.
“You can do nothing, but then our grandkids are going to wonder the next time there’s a big drought why we didn’t do anything,” he said.
Support Local Journalism
Support Local Journalism
Readers around Glenwood Springs and Garfield County make the Post Independent’s work possible. Your financial contribution supports our efforts to deliver quality, locally relevant journalism.
Now more than ever, your support is critical to help us keep our community informed about the evolving coronavirus pandemic and the impact it is having locally. Every contribution, however large or small, will make a difference.
Each donation will be used exclusively for the development and creation of increased news coverage.
Start a dialogue, stay on topic and be civil.
If you don't follow the rules, your comment may be deleted.
User Legend: Moderator Trusted User
Garfield County commissioners want to get a better sense of the local economic impacts of the state’s new oil and gas regulations that came as a result of the 2019 passage of Senate Bill 181.