Defense asks for a special prosecutor in Aspen police officer’s case
ASPEN, Colorado – The defense attorney for a fired Aspen police officer said Monday he will request a special prosecutor in the criminal case against Joe Holman, who allegedly hid a video camera in a shower stall used by a teen-aged girl.
Holman, 38, made his first court appearance Monday in connection to the allegations that led to his arrest and resignation last month. The girl was living at Holman’s house at the time of the incident, which authorities say happened in April.
Holman, who joined the Aspen Police Department in 2000, was arrested June 28 following a probe by the Pitkin County Sheriff’s Office and the Colorado Bureau of Investigation. He had been on paid administrative leave from his patrol officer post since May 29.
Wearing a coat and tie and accompanied by family members, Holman sat through a brief hearing in Pitkin County District Court, where authorities plan to charge him with two counts of attempted sexual exploitation of a child, tampering with evidence, child abuse and attempted criminal invasion of privacy, according to court records.
The filing of the counts, however, has been put on hold, after Wills said he wants a special prosecutor on the case. Jon Pototsky of the 9th Judicial District Attorney’s Office was in court to file the charges, but Judge James Boyd told Pototsky he must rule on Wills’ motion seeking a special prosecutor before the case can proceed.
Pototsky appeared as a replacement for Deputy District Attorney Arnold Mordkin, who normally handles felony cases in Pitkin County.
Mordkin, however, was taken off the case to remove the potential for the appearance of a conflict of interest, as Aspen police work closely with Pitkin County prosecutors on criminal cases. Mordkin’s office also is on the ground level floor of the Pitkin County Court house, while the Aspen Police Department is headquartered on the floor below.
After the hearing, Wills said that although Pototsky is based in Glenwood Springs and apparently has no close ties to Holman, the defense attorney still wants to bring in a prosecutor from outside of the 9th Judicial District, which comprises Garfield, Pitkin and Rio Blanco counties.
“In my view there is a conflict even with [Pototsky],” Wills said. “We want somebody to prosecute who is not influenced by the 9th Judicial District Attorney’s Office.”
Wills said Holman’s spirits are “good, given the circumstances he’s in.”
“He has the love and support of his family,” Wills said. “Obviously his world has been turned upside down – losing his job and having this played out in the press.”
Wills suggested there is more to the case against Holman than what authorities have presented.
“We expect to deny many of the allegations,” he said.
Wills said he doesn’t expect to request a change of venue or judge.
Judge James Boyd, who is presiding over the case, gave Wills two weeks to file his motion requesting a special prosecutor. A hearing regarding the motion is set for Sept. 21.
Support Local Journalism
Support Local Journalism
Readers around Glenwood Springs and Garfield County make the Post Independent’s work possible. Your financial contribution supports our efforts to deliver quality, locally relevant journalism.
Now more than ever, your support is critical to help us keep our community informed about the evolving coronavirus pandemic and the impact it is having locally. Every contribution, however large or small, will make a difference.
Each donation will be used exclusively for the development and creation of increased news coverage.
Start a dialogue, stay on topic and be civil.
If you don't follow the rules, your comment may be deleted.
User Legend: Moderator Trusted User
Glenwood Springs City Council voted Thursday for a South Bridge option that would go under the city’s airport and avoid shortening the runway, which is projected to add at least $6 million to the overall…