Denver court dismisses Garfield County-led lawsuit challenging clean air rules
Editor’s note: This story has been revised and corrected from the original version to reflect that Garfield County’s funding for the lawsuit is just part of the county’s overall $1.5 million allocated to participate in the ongoing SB-191 rulemaking process.
A Denver district judge has dismissed a lawsuit brought by 10 counties, including Garfield County, that had challenged new state regulations designed to cut oil and gas industry emissions.
Denver District Court Judge Martin Foster Egelhoff on Tuesday granted a motion by the state of Colorado to dismiss the lawsuit led by Garfield County.
The new rules were adopted by the Colorado Air Quality Control Commission (AQCC) in Dec. 2019, and were among the first provisions put in place under Senate Bill 181, the sweeping legislation passed last year that changed the way oil and gas is regulated in the state.
The air quality regulations mandate reductions in ozone-forming pollutants and methane emissions from oil and gas development.
In late July, a different judge dismissed a similar lawsuit filed by Weld County, on the grounds that the county did not have standing to sue the state.
In his Tuesday decision, Egelhoff cited the Weld decision, noting in his written ruling that Garfield County and its coalition “… will not suffer any direct harm or cost from compliance with the revised [regulation], and that the indirect and incidental impacts that may flow from subsequent business decisions of third parties are insufficient to confer standing.”
A coalition of community alliance and conservation groups were recently granted the right to intervene in the state’s defense of the case.
The lawsuit — funded as part of Garfield County’s $1.5 million investment as a participant in the broader SB-191 rulemaking process — sought to overturn a new rule requiring oil and gas companies to conduct more frequent inspection of facilities located within 1,000 feet of homes, playgrounds, schools and other occupied areas.
Garfield County has also argued that the AQCC did not adequately consider local concerns and economic impacts in making the rules, and that smaller well sites in rural areas should be handled differently than the larger Front Range operations.
Community groups, including the Grand Valley Citizens Alliance based in Rifle, had lobbied hard for that requirement to be part of the new regulations.
Egelhoff’s decision allows the new air quality provisions to take effect statewide.
Support Local Journalism
Support Local Journalism
Readers around Glenwood Springs and Garfield County make the Post Independent’s work possible. Your financial contribution supports our efforts to deliver quality, locally relevant journalism.
Now more than ever, your support is critical to help us keep our community informed about the evolving coronavirus pandemic and the impact it is having locally. Every contribution, however large or small, will make a difference.
Each donation will be used exclusively for the development and creation of increased news coverage.
Start a dialogue, stay on topic and be civil.
If you don't follow the rules, your comment may be deleted.
User Legend: Moderator Trusted User
The conversation around water speculation has been heating up in Colorado in recent months. At the direction of state lawmakers, a work group has been meeting regularly to explore ways to strengthen the state’s anti-speculation law.