District court judge puts a hold on Mayo | PostIndependent.com

District court judge puts a hold on Mayo

Bob Mayo’s constitutional challenge of Garfield County building ordinances hit a snag Oct. 15 when a district court judge ruled against Mayo.

Mayo, of 2095 County Road 245, New Castle, built a 2,400-square-foot structure on his 66-acre property without a county building permit last year, then turned it over to the American Legion Post 164 for a meeting hall.

Mayo claimed he didn’t need to have the structure inspected, or obtain a conditional use permit, because it was an agricultural building.

Garfield County filed a temporary restraining order against Mayo, and his wife, Naomi, in August to prevent the structure from being used as a meeting hall.

On Oct. 15, following a hearing, District Judge Thomas Ossola upheld the county’s motion for a preliminary injunction against the Mayos. His ruling bars them from using the structure for anything other than agricultural purposes “as defined by county ordinances and regulations,” according to court documents.

Bob Mayo was not available for comment.

Ossola said the Mayos, the defendants in the case, failed to convince him that the county ordinances and regulations are unconstitutional, and were unconstitutionally applied to them.

The plaintiff, Garfield County, proved that “irreparable harm may result from the continued conduct of defendants in using the unpermitted structure for nonagricultural purposes,” Ossola wrote.

At the Oct. 15 hearing, county building inspector Andy Schwaller testified that a structure intended purely for agricultural use is not required to have a building permit. He also testified the building’s amenities indicated “human habitation or use for nonagricultural purposes.”

The county and Mayos didn’t dispute the fact the building contains bathrooms, carpeting and “other amenities inconsistent with agricultural use,” said court documents.

Before the building can be used for community meetings or as a community center, the Mayos must first obtain the appropriate county permits and authorizations, Ossola ruled.

Ossola also ordered the county to submit a written status report by Dec. 1.

Garfield County attorney Don DeFord briefed the county commissioners on the case during an executive session Monday.

In June, Mayo, 72, told the commissioners he didn’t plan to have the building inspected and would not obtain a special-use permit.

He said the United States has a long history of grange halls and other public meeting places in rural parts of the country, and for the county to require a special-use permit for his building is a violation of the public’s rights to gather.

“That’s our Constitutional right,” he told the commissioners in June.

Contact Lynn Burton: 945-8515, ext. 534


Support Local Journalism

Support Local Journalism

Readers around Glenwood Springs and Garfield County make the Post Independent’s work possible. Your financial contribution supports our efforts to deliver quality, locally relevant journalism.

Now more than ever, your support is critical to help us keep our community informed about the evolving coronavirus pandemic and the impact it is having locally. Every contribution, however large or small, will make a difference.

Each donation will be used exclusively for the development and creation of increased news coverage.

For tax deductible donations, click here.

Start a dialogue, stay on topic and be civil.
If you don't follow the rules, your comment may be deleted.

User Legend: iconModerator iconTrusted User


Community Profile: Creating a journey through music

“Turn off the lights! Turn off the lights!” the crowd yelled as Joseph Thompson stood behind his music mixing board and flashing strobe lights inside the school gym during Thursday night’s special halftime performance on…

See more