Don’t sacrifice the Rocky Mtn. Region
Dear Editor,Are you ready? The next great political battle for oil and gas drilling will be right here in the Rocky Mountains!The Bush administration’s energy plan as announced in March 2001 placed the highest priority on new domestic energy exploration and development, specifically in three target areas: the Gulf of Mexico near Florida’s beaches, the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge in Alaska and the Rocky Mountain region.After one year of relentless efforts to promote its domestic drilling plans, the administration has been rebuffed in Florida and Alaska. First, the Florida voters and brother Jeb Bush convinced the president that drilling near their fabled beaches was not a proper reward for their electoral support. Then the Senate nixed drilling plans in the Arctic Refuge, at least for now, by a narrow margin of 54-45.So it is no surprise that Colorado and other Rocky Mountain states are now the biggest prize for new oil & gas leases. The U.S. Geological Survey estimates that there may be as much as 2 million barrels of oil and over 100 trillion cubic feet of natural gas locked up in this multi-state region. Thousands of new leases have already been issued during the past 12 months. The question therefore is not “To Drill or not to Drill,” but rather where and at what cost?Already the drumbeat to put ever more public acres on the auction block is becoming louder every day. But hold off: Before we give in to political pressure from Washington and the oil and gas lobby and scare mongering about running out of oil, let’s remind the politicians and the drillers that the Rocky Mountain West is already wide open for business.In Colorado alone, more than 85 percent of BLM lands, or 7.2 million acres, are already open to oil and gas exploration. This acreage does not include exploration of U.S. Forest lands and private property. The story is much the same in our neighboring states! How much is enough?Less than 15 percent of Colorado BLM lands remain “off limit” to oil and gas exploration and other extractive activities. These are lands of outstanding scenic and natural beauty including national monuments, wilderness areas and wilderness study areas. There can be no compromise when it comes to continuing the ban of drilling and exploration in these special areas.Sadly, however, the current energy debate in Washington is long on political rhetoric and catering to special interests and shamefully short on a bi-partisan commitment to a long-term sustainable energy strategy. The Congress, including Colorado’s senators and Western Colorado representative Scott McInnis, dismally failed to support meaningful energy conservation proposals such as a gradual increase of gas mileage standards.In the absence of an energy policy that truly represents our national interest and puts a high priority on conservation, alternative fuel sources and research and development for clean energy, we should not accept ever more drilling pads on our public lands.Let’s not sacrifice the Rocky Mountain region!Sincerely,Gerry VanderbeekGlenwood Springs
Support Local Journalism
Support Local Journalism
Readers around Glenwood Springs and Garfield County make the Post Independent’s work possible. Your financial contribution supports our efforts to deliver quality, locally relevant journalism.
Now more than ever, your support is critical to help us keep our community informed about the evolving coronavirus pandemic and the impact it is having locally. Every contribution, however large or small, will make a difference.
Each donation will be used exclusively for the development and creation of increased news coverage.
Start a dialogue, stay on topic and be civil.
If you don't follow the rules, your comment may be deleted.
User Legend: Moderator Trusted User