If passed, how will the ‘More Housing Now’ bill affect rural resort towns specifically?
The “More Housing Now” bill that was sent to the Colorado Senate last week is a statewide zoning reform for housing that has a specific wording for rural resort municipalities.
The bill was proposed by Gov. Jared Polis to address strategic growth on a statewide and regional level, but it does not aim to encourage actual growth, said Nathan Landquist, the land use planner/analyst with the Colorado Department of Transportation.
What the bill will do is lift restrictions on accessory dwelling units and middle housing like duplexes and triplexes, along with removing square footage requirement and occupancy requirements.
It will also require housing needs assessments and strategic growth planning, including water conservation strategies, along with encouraging focused growth along major transportation corridors.
For urban municipalities the guidelines will be more strict, but for resort communities many of these guidelines are flexible.
Middle housing, development along key corridors and removing occupancy and square footage requirements are all listed as areas that will be given “additional flexibility.”
Healthier Colorado is a nonprofit organization that recently created a statewide poll to see where state residents stood on a statewide housing initiative.
“It doesn’t require any type of homes specifically to be built and it doesn’t get rid of so-called single-family zoning at all,” Healthier Colorado’s Senior Director of Communications, Kyle Piccola, said.
Some local leaders have expressed concern, like Republican state Sen. Perry Will of New Castle, who said he was not comfortable with the loss of local government control. But he said he has not made a decision on it yet.
“We need affordable housing, and we need kind of a statewide solution to that because of the housing shortage as well as the affordability crisis in this realm, but the land use and taking away the local control, that’s concerning,” Will said.
Garfield County Commissioner Tom Jankovsky shared similar concerns about a potential loss of local control when speaking on a panel during the recent Habitat for Humanity Roaring Fork Valley regional housing summit.
Housing plans and needs assessments
The bill proposes requiring state and local governments to create a housing needs assessment. This will include the amount of housing needed in the region for different income levels.
The 2019 Greater Roaring Fork Regional Housing Study, conducted through regional collaboration, covers a lot of these topics.
They will also be asked to create housing targets combining zoning reform, affordable housing programs, infrastructure investments, economic and financial tools, anti-displacement and more.
This has already been common practice in Summit and Eagle counties, and recently in Glenwood Springs.
Allowing accessory dwelling units (ADUs)
This part of the bill would lift zoning codes that restrict ADUs and prevent homeowner associations (HOAs) and planned unit developments (PUDs) from blocking ADUs.
Municipalities will be given the option to choose a local flexible code that will need to follow minimum state standards defined in the bill, or they can choose the state’s model code, which would be developed over the next year through a public process.
The bill will allow cities like Glenwood Springs, Aspen and Vail to limit the amount of ADUs used for short-term rentals to create more housing opportunities. Many mountain resort municipalities have already restricted short-term rentals, including Glenwood Springs, Carbondale, Steamboat Springs, Aspen and Summit County.
Glenwood Springs created a 250-foot buffer zone for STRs with an interactive map, which included ADUs.
Where this would affect Glenwood Springs’ ADU code, is by removing the requirement for one off-street parking space for the unit. It could shorten the permit processing time as well.
Allowing middle housing
Although resort municipalities will be given more flexibility with allowing middle housing, the bill will aim to allow middle housing in areas where it would typically be restricted.
Specifically for rural resort municipalities, this will be handled as a regional planning process to determine the most appropriate places for additional middle housing.
It will also loosen restrictions on prefabricated building materials and modular homes to make building homes more efficient and cost effective, Piccola said.
Encouraging development along key corridors
This would encourage density development near major transportation corridors like bus transit stations and commercial corridors. It would also require some form of inclusionary housing standard and lift the requirements on parking spaces per housing unit.
The idea would be to encourage apartment complexes and mixed-use development near transit stations, with lower parking requirements. Ideally, if people are next to a transit line they will not need to own a car.
This area was given additional flexibility for resort communities because of the higher necessity to own a vehicle in the more rural Western Slope.
Removing occupancy restrictions and square foot requirements
This bill would remove residential occupancy requirements for non-familiar households, and it will also restrict square-foot requirements, preventing cities from requiring minimum home sizes to allow the development of smaller homes.
For example, in Glenwood Springs there are no minimum square-foot requirements on houses, though there are minimum square foot lots and zoning districts that range from rural residential to high-density. This allows a transition from high density central commercial areas to transition and preserves rural areas.
According to local zoning language, Glenwood would not be affected, but maintaining wilderness land and rural land would be acknowledged.
Strategic growth planning & water
The bill will take steps to rein in sprawl by directing the state to develop “Strategic Growth Objectives” to better integrate transportation, land use and water planning, and align state funding with affordable housing and climate-friendly land use, according to the bill.
The bill will require municipalities to create strategic growth objectives to focus growth in more urban areas near jobs and transportation, to reduce traffic, pollution and wasteful water practices.
This will also require municipalities to add water conservation strategies as part of comprehensive planning. Local governments will also be required to conduct water loss audits to identify opportunities for water conservation and efficiency.
The bill will set aside $15 million for state and local planning assistance to complete local housing plans.
Support Local Journalism
Support Local Journalism
Readers around Glenwood Springs and Garfield County make the Post Independent’s work possible. Your financial contribution supports our efforts to deliver quality, locally relevant journalism.
Now more than ever, your support is critical to help us keep our community informed about the evolving coronavirus pandemic and the impact it is having locally. Every contribution, however large or small, will make a difference.
Each donation will be used exclusively for the development and creation of increased news coverage.