Letters to the Editor
I am writing in response to the letter by Marty Lich on Dec. 23 titled, “Differences between law breaking illegal aliens and immigrants.” She stated that Catholic Charities supplied a lawyer for an immigrant in court. Catholic Charities does not supply lawyers in criminal or civil court.
What we do offer is a mediation service between immigrants (documented and undocumented) and other individuals in the community with whom the immigrant has a disagreement. These matters involve almost every situation imaginable, but oftentimes do involve pay disputes. We help the two parties bridge the language and cultural barriers that can create an impasse. In about 50 percent of the cases the two parties come to an agreement.
Unfortunately some cases are not successful, and these sometimes lead to the immigrant taking the other party to court or filing a complaint with a state regulatory agency. Our community advocate will act as a translator in small claims court. We do this as a service because the court is not required to provide a translator.
Some people get angry with Catholic Charities over helping immigrants. We do this because they are often (not always) the “least among us” in terms of wealth and power.
If people have a problem with U.S. immigration policies they shouldn’t be complaining about the many fine agencies in this valley that help immigrants. Please write to your federal legislators to create changes. Until then, Catholic Charities and others will continue to serve.
This letter is in response to the extremely balanced and well-written story, “Plans for old police station downsized,” by Dennis Webb, in the Thursday, Dec. 30, edition of the paper.
According to the story, the new owners of the building at 823 Blake Ave. plan a “downsized” version of “only” 40 feet, and they look on that as a “good thing” for the neighborhood. In actuality, the building will still block residents’ views of Red Mountain and will still keep the sun from reaching the sidewalk several hours each day. Since the new owners bought the building, the sidewalk has not been shoveled even once. The house to the north of it is shoveled immediately, as is the library to the south. Indeed, the sidewalks in front of all the other houses and offices on the street are shoveled after every snowfall. Residents of the senior housing one block north walk past that building on a regular basis to get to the library. The new owners insist they want to be good neighbors. In my opinion, they are already bad neighbors.
The architect of the property, Jeff Johnson, says it’s going to be a much better fit to the neighborhood, yet it will still block the view of Red Mountain and will create more of a safety hazard on the sidewalk than it does now, since the current height of the building already prevents the snow and ice from melting.
We don’t need additional office buildings, especially on a street that is already burdened with a lack of parking. This project is being developed for the financial interests of the owners. It does not take the concerns of the residents into consideration.
Support Local Journalism
Support Local Journalism
Readers around Glenwood Springs and Garfield County make the Post Independent’s work possible. Your financial contribution supports our efforts to deliver quality, locally relevant journalism.
Now more than ever, your support is critical to help us keep our community informed about the evolving coronavirus pandemic and the impact it is having locally. Every contribution, however large or small, will make a difference.
Each donation will be used exclusively for the development and creation of increased news coverage.
Start a dialogue, stay on topic and be civil.
If you don't follow the rules, your comment may be deleted.
User Legend: Moderator Trusted User
Policy that dictates what for-profit activities should be officially sanctioned within Glenwood Springs parks is being reviewed by city staff and will likely come before the city council for final approval later this summer.