Parent reports explain student test results |

Parent reports explain student test results

Parents of public school students who took the new standardized state tests last spring will soon be receiving a new kind of report card explaining how their children did compared with their classmates and peers across Colorado.

One requirement of the new Partnership for Assessments in Readiness for College and Careers (PARCC) English language arts and math testing program is for local school districts to send a detailed report home to parents in an effort to help them understand their students’ individual results.

The tests were administered from third through 11th grade last school year. Individual student reports should be in parents’ hands by the first of January, according to Roaring Fork School District Superintendent Diana Sirko.

“Please keep in mind that these scores cannot be compared to the old test scores,” Sirko writes in her latest parent newsletter distributed this week.

“The new tests measure different things, such as a student’s ability to think critically and problem solve …” she writes in part. “With the change may come some growing pains, and your child’s score may be lower than what you saw before.”

Instead of measuring students on a scale of four proficiency levels, as the former Colorado Student Assessment Program and transitional tests did, the new PARCC tests measure students as either “below” “nearly meets” “meets” or “exceeds” expectations in English language and math skills.

The tests are based on the new, more rigorous academic standards adopted by Colorado in 2013-14. Math and English, including reading, writing and vocabulary, are measured using the PARCC tests, while science and social studies are tested separately under the new Colorado Measures of Academic Success.

The parent reports show how the district as a whole and their school did at each grade level tested compared with statewide results, as well as the participation rate for each grade level.

Under the PARCC program, parents are allowed to opt their students out of taking the tests.

The reports also show how the individual student stacked up against their classmates, the district and state averages in each performance area.

Each student receives a numerical score and, based on that, is ranked in one of five performance levels, according to an explanation included with the report.

“Level 1 indicates a student is not yet meeting grade level expectations and level 5 indicates the student has a thorough understanding of grade-level material,” it explains.

Students scoring a 4 or 5 “are on track to be ready for college-level coursework when they graduate from high school.”

“The state has done a nice job of giving us more detailed information, and more useful information,” said Rob Stein, assistant superintendent and chief academic officer for RFSD.

“We are now sharing that with students and families and teachers,” he said. “It gives us a whole complement of tools that are helpful for us to actually use the data to help students learn.”

The district urges parents to use the scores and information in conversations with teachers about enrichment programs and other support that can be reinforced at home to help them improve or to stay on track if they are already meeting expectations.

Support Local Journalism

Support Local Journalism

Readers around Glenwood Springs and Garfield County make the Post Independent’s work possible. Your financial contribution supports our efforts to deliver quality, locally relevant journalism.

Now more than ever, your support is critical to help us keep our community informed about the evolving coronavirus pandemic and the impact it is having locally. Every contribution, however large or small, will make a difference.

Each donation will be used exclusively for the development and creation of increased news coverage.

For tax deductible donations, click here.

Start a dialogue, stay on topic and be civil.
If you don't follow the rules, your comment may be deleted.

User Legend: iconModerator iconTrusted User


Report: Estimates of future Upper Colorado River Basin water use confound previous planning

A report released this month by the Center for Colorado River Studies says that in order to sustainably manage the river in the face of climate change, officials need alternative management paradigms and a different way of thinking compared with the status quo. Estimates about how much water the Upper Colorado River Basin states will use in the future are a problem that needs rethinking, according to the white paper.

See more