Main Street businesses split on VCR proposal |

Main Street businesses split on VCR proposal

John Colson
Post Independent Staff
Glenwood Springs, Colorado CO
Kelley Cox Post IndependentBusiness owners and managers on Main Street in Carbondale are split in their views on the proposed Village at Crystal River development, and on whether they would consider moving their business if the mixed use development is approved by voters in the Jan. 31 election. Speaking out on the issue are, from left, Shane Vetter, owner of Fatbelly Burgers; Skip Bell, manager of The Pour House; and Lori Haroutunian, owner of Floral Boutique.

CARBONDALE, Colorado – An informal survey of 10 Main Street businesses revealed that three of the 10 favor the Village at Crystal River proposal. Two of the 10 – one supporter and one opponent – would consider moving if the new commercial center is built.

As Carbondale voters face a special Jan. 31 election over whether to uphold or overturn the town government’s approval of the project, critics charge that the project would rob downtown Carbondale of its business vitality.

On Wednesday, the Post Independent interviewed owners or managers at Fatbelly Burgers, The Pour House, San Juan Leathers, European Antiques, Main Street Spirits, The Floral Boutique, Peppino’s Pizza, Eco Goddess, The Roadside Gallery and Lulubelle.

Sidney Poncelet, owner of European Antiques, is unabashedly in support of the project, although she lives out of town and cannot vote in the election.

“I don’t think it’ll hurt the businesses of Main Street,” she said. “I see it as two separate entities.” She described Carbondale as maintaining its historic downtown shopping district and, if the Village is approved and built, a more modern mall with nearby housing at the edge of town.

But as the owner of the Main Street building housing her business, Poncelet said she would not move her store to the VCR.

“Even if I were renting, I don’t think I’d move out there,” she said. “I’m not a mall shopper, anyway.”

Conversely, Shane Vetter, owner of Fatbelly Burgers, said he opposes the project, but would consider moving his restaurant to the new development.

Vetter said his main concern is the possibility of a national fast food chain locating at the VCR.

“If they bring in chains, it’s going to completely destroy the little guy like me. There’s no room for us. I’d be out of business in six months,” he said.

But if the VCR zoning and development approvals are upheld by the voters, Vetter said he would “definitely be open” to moving to the new commercial area.

“I’d like to see what their plan is,” he said. “I’m not 100 percent against these types of things.”

At The Pour House, manager Skip Bell said, “At this time, in this economy, I have to say I’m against it.” He doubted whether the Village commercial development would bring more people to shop in Carbondale, either at the VCR or downtown.

“There was a time when I thought it might serve the economy,” Bell said of earlier proposals for the 24-acre site. “But I’ve changed my thinking on that. I don’t think the timing is right.”

Even if the Village is approved, Bell said he would not consider moving his business there.

Rosie Wettstein, owner of Main Street Spirits, said she supports the project and would consider moving to the new development.

“Sure, why not?” she said of moving. “Then there’d be all the liquor stores in town on Highway 133.

“I do think it would be good for Carbondale, and I think it would bring more people into Carbondale,” she said. “I feel like everybody who lives in Carbondale spends their money up and down the valley.” She hopes the Village would draw shoppers back to Carbondale.

Lori Haroutunian, owner of the Floral Boutique, said she is uncertain about effects the Village might have on downtown businesses.

She said she is skeptical about developer Rich Schierburg’s claim that the VCR will be a magnet for shoppers from other parts of the valley.

“We, the businesses that we have now on Main Street, are the magnets,” she said.

Would she move Floral Boutique?

“No. That’s a quick no-brainer,” she said, without missing a beat. “Why would a business that’s been here 18 years relocate from an historic Main Street spot?”

At Peppino’s Pizza, manager Rick Burrows said he worries how a chain restaurant at the Village might affect his business, which has been on Main Street for 28 years. Peppino’s wouldn’t move, he said, but he supports the Village proposal “if it’s done right,” because the town is growing anyway.

Lisa Ruoff, owner of the Eco Goddess restaurant, said she opposes the project.

“There’s not enough commercial base to support anything like that,” she said. She also doubts projections that a new City Market would draw shoppers from other towns.

“I’m not anti-growth,” she said. “I would like to see some kind of sustainable step into the future on that site.”

But the current Village proposal before voters, she said, “is just old thought patterns.” It’s not a place where she would want to have her restaurant.

“I like being in downtown, I like being where people can walk here,” she said.

Support Local Journalism

Support Local Journalism

Readers around Glenwood Springs and Garfield County make the Post Independent’s work possible. Your financial contribution supports our efforts to deliver quality, locally relevant journalism.

Now more than ever, your support is critical to help us keep our community informed about the evolving coronavirus pandemic and the impact it is having locally. Every contribution, however large or small, will make a difference.

Each donation will be used exclusively for the development and creation of increased news coverage.

For tax deductible donations, click here.

Start a dialogue, stay on topic and be civil.
If you don't follow the rules, your comment may be deleted.

User Legend: iconModerator iconTrusted User