Medical pot case may be in the weeds
After a judge’s ruling Monday, a jury may have to decide when life begins.No, it’s not about abortion, it’s about pot – the medical kind.The arrest of a Rifle woman last summer for growing medical marijuana has spawned a complicated legal case in which the viability of her marijuana plants is at issue.Officers with the Two Rivers Drug Enforcement Team searched the home of Jennifer Ryan on July 30, allegedly seizing more than 100 plants, both full-grown and fledgling plants known as “cuttings.” Ryan, 23, is licensed by the state to grow 24 marijuana plants for six of her patients. TRIDENT’s subsequent mishandling of the evidence may have hampered their case against Ryan, because the prosecution may have trouble proving which plants were full-grown and which were simply cuttings.What is now impossible to discern is whether those cuttings constitute bona fide plants. That could be crucial for a jury in deciding whether Ryan violated the number of plants she was allowed by law to possess.The mix-up of evidence appears to have started when TRIDENT officers, in violation of the Medical Marijuana Amendment in the Colorado Constitution, destroyed some of the full-grown plants, saving just a single leaf from each plant as evidence.”So all they have left is this leaf, and it’s impossible to tell whether that leaf was cut from a live, thriving plant, or whether it was from a cutting,” said Ryan’s attorney, Kristopher Hammond. The difference is crucial, he said, because the cops had no way of knowing whether the clippings were going to survive.District Judge James Boyd ruled that task force officers took the plants to a landfill after they learned about the Medical Marijuana Amendment.Under that 2000 amendment, “the cops are required … to keep the plants alive and to return them if she wins. That’s out the window,” Hammond said.Boyd said the destruction of the plants by police was “not an innocent or good-faith mistake. TRIDENT knew or should have known that the number of plants would be important in determining whether or not a crime occurred.” The judge’s ruling says TRIDENT conceded that it violated the Medical Marijuana Amendment.The Medical Marijuana Amendment allows a caregiver to grow six plants per patient. Ryan had four certificates, which allows 24 plants, Hammond said. “The question then becomes, how many plants can they prove up against Jennifer Ryan?”Further muddying the waters is the fact that some of the plants are dead.”(With) a dead little thing that’s all shriveled up, it’s impossible for anybody to say whether it was a thriving plant on its own or it was just a cutting,” Hammond said. “When does plant life begin?” Hammond continued. “Obviously, our contention is that doesn’t happen the moment you snip it off and put it in soil. It has to live and thrive on its own. And that’s going to be hard for us to show because they’re all shriveled up and dead.”Boyd’s ruling may hamper both the prosecution and the defense because it says that any piece of evidence that is less than a whole plant can’t be used at trial.The end result is “it limits the evidence the prosecution can bring forward. They’re not going to be able to produce any pictures of any of these plants. The judge said that if you destroy the root system, then you’ve deprived the defendant of a way to defend against the charges,” Hammond said. “The only admissible evidence will be the plants and/or cuttings which are intact and haven’t been cut by the police.”Authorities claim they found 133 plants of various sizes at Ryan’s apartment. Hammond said he didn’t know how many intact plants police plan to present as evidence.A jury will take up the issue of when plant life begins during a four-day trial set to begin June 14 in Glenwood Springs.
Support Local Journalism
Support Local Journalism
Readers around Glenwood Springs and Garfield County make the Post Independent’s work possible. Your financial contribution supports our efforts to deliver quality, locally relevant journalism.
Now more than ever, your support is critical to help us keep our community informed about the evolving coronavirus pandemic and the impact it is having locally. Every contribution, however large or small, will make a difference.
Each donation will be used exclusively for the development and creation of increased news coverage.
Start a dialogue, stay on topic and be civil.
If you don't follow the rules, your comment may be deleted.
User Legend: Moderator Trusted User
No decision on Ascendigo camp after hearing spills into third day; debate focuses on ‘educational facility’ definition to meet rural zoning
Whether Ascendigo Autism Services’ proposed Missouri Heights camp meets Garfield County’s definition as an “education facility” dominated much of the debate during a full day of public comment before county commissioners Tuesday.