Aspen airport environmental effects limited
A national consulting firm has found that a new Aspen airport terminal and relocated runway will result in just one significant environmental impact, an official said last week.
The architectural and planning firm Mead and Hunt looked at 23 different possible impacts, including noise, air quality and historical aspects and found that 1.5 acres of wetlands must be relocated, said airport director John Kinney.
Those wetlands, located near the Buttermilk ski area end of the airport, can be relocated on site or in another area of the county, he said.
“It is good news for everyone involved,” Kinney said Thursday.
Kinney and other officials presented the environmental assessment findings Thursday at an open house held at the Gant Hotel in Aspen.
The full impact report is not quite finished yet, with a bit more work to be done on areas of air quality and socioeconomic impacts of the project, Kinney said. Once those are completed in the next couple of weeks, both the Pitkin Board of County Commissioners and the Federal Aviation Administration will hold public hearings on the findings, he said.
Last fall, officials unveiled two possible designs for a new terminal. Both would be a minimum of 80,000 square feet — as opposed to the current terminal’s 47,00 square feet — though the environmental assessment looked at the impact of a 140,000-square-foot facility.
Pitkin County Manager Jon Peacock has said the county would not build a facility that large.
The environmental assessment also looked at the impacts of relocating and widening the runway, Kinney said. Officials have said the runway needs to be moved 80 feet to the west and be widened from 100 to 150 feet to accommodate a new class of regional jets with larger wingspans.
The entire project is slated to cost about $96 million, Peacock has said.
Support Local Journalism
Support Local Journalism
Readers around Glenwood Springs and Garfield County make the Post Independent’s work possible. Your financial contribution supports our efforts to deliver quality, locally relevant journalism.
Now more than ever, your support is critical to help us keep our community informed about the evolving coronavirus pandemic and the impact it is having locally. Every contribution, however large or small, will make a difference.
Each donation will be used exclusively for the development and creation of increased news coverage.
Start a dialogue, stay on topic and be civil.
If you don't follow the rules, your comment may be deleted.
User Legend: Moderator Trusted User
This is the second column in a series based on “Nourish, The Definitive Plant-Based Nutrition Guide for Families,” by Stanford-based pediatrician Reshma Shah, M.D., MPH, and registered dietitian Brenda Davis. Last week’s column was about…