Owens stumps for GOP candidates, vs. amendment
Saying Amendment 36 amounts to Colorado “unilaterally disarming,” Gov. Bill Owens simultaneously took his campaign against the measure to the local and national levels during a visit to Glenwood Springs Monday.Owens visited the Buffalo Valley Inn for a rally of local Republicans. While there, he also voiced his opposition to 36 to members of the Glenwood Springs Post Independent editorial board, and to a national audience during an interview with CNN.Owens sat alone in front of a CNN camera, fielding questions remotely from a network interviewer about his stance on 36 and the status of the race for president. As he spoke, Republicans young and old, many wearing Bush-Cheney stickers, watched from behind him, trying hard to honor a request by Owens’ aides to keep quiet for the camera. If Amendment 36 is approved and withstands court challenges, the state’s nine Electoral College votes would be awarded proportionate to the popular vote. Currently, they are awarded on a winner-take-all basis.
Owens said that this would usually mean that whichever presidential candidate wins the state would end up with five votes, and the loser four, leaving Colorado virtually inconsequential in the presidential race.Supporters of 36 say the state should take the lead in proportional voting, helping propel a national movement to change how Electoral College votes are awarded. But Owens fears that other states won’t follow, leaving Colorado with little political influence.”What would be bad for Colorado would be to do this essentially by ourselves,” he told CNN.He said he fears the result could be that when presidents have to choose between Colorado and other states on such matters as military base closings or highway funding, Colorado will lose out.”I can clearly see where some administrations might choose to go where the electoral votes are,” Owens told the Post Independent.”It doesn’t make any sense to disarm that way.”
Owens said state legislatures have historically shown themselves unwilling to go to counting electoral votes proportionally, and only 16 states give citizens the power to act on state matters through ballot initiatives, Owens said.However, the U.S. Constitution says that the state legislature must make changes in the electoral system. But in Colorado, a court ruling has held that citizen initiatives are legislative functions.He expects that ruling to be challenged if 36 passes. But in the meantime, he fears the measure’s consequences for Colorado.”If we were doing this nationally, I wouldn’t be nearly as opposed to it,” Owens said.Owens said 36 is driven by outside interests that favor Democratic presidential candidate John Kerry and hope to win him election votes even if President Bush wins the popular vote in Colorado. But he said the Democrats’ strategy could backfire in a future presidential election if a Democratic candidate wins the popular vote.Owens said the current electoral system favors Colorado, making it a battleground state in presidential elections such as this one.
“Electoral votes make small states more important,” he said.Speaking of the current race with CNN, Owens talked about what he considers to be increasing support for President Bush among female voters, due to concerns about protecting families and standing up to terrorism.”More and more, we’re starting to see women supporting President Bush. It’s a question of who do you trust most to protect your family,” he said.Contact Dennis Webb: 945-8515, ext. firstname.lastname@example.org
Support Local Journalism
Support Local Journalism
Readers around Glenwood Springs and Garfield County make the Post Independent’s work possible. Your financial contribution supports our efforts to deliver quality, locally relevant journalism.
Now more than ever, your support is critical to help us keep our community informed about the evolving coronavirus pandemic and the impact it is having locally. Every contribution, however large or small, will make a difference.
Each donation will be used exclusively for the development and creation of increased news coverage.
Start a dialogue, stay on topic and be civil.
If you don't follow the rules, your comment may be deleted.
User Legend: Moderator Trusted User
Policy that dictates what for-profit activities should be officially sanctioned within Glenwood Springs parks is being reviewed by city staff and will likely come before the city council for final approval later this summer.