Pitkin County scores federal funds | PostIndependent.com

Pitkin County scores federal funds

Scott Condon
The Aspen Times

A program that pumps millions of dollars into the coffers of the governments of Pitkin, Eagle and Garfield counties faces an uncertain future because of the federal budget situation.

About 1,900 rural governments, mostly counties, reap federal Payment In Lieu of Taxes, or PILT, funds each year. It’s the federal government’s way of compensating counties for property taxes they miss out on because of federal ownership of land.

But rural counties don’t always get top priority in Congress, especially during fiscal austerity moves. Colorado Sens. Michael Bennet and Mark Udall scrambled last year to help keep the PILT program alive. Authorizing for payments was attached to a transportation bill.

This year, $21.5 million was shaved from the program because of federal sequestration — mandatory cuts to the federal budget after Congress failed to craft its own plan.

Counties receive funds based on a formula that includes their percentage of federal lands, population and prior year payments from revenue sharing of mineral leasing royalties.

Pitkin County’s share of PILT funds dropped slightly to $1,251,871 this year from $1,281,933 in 2012.

Eagle County’s payment fell to $2,042,388 this year from $2,094,020 last year.

The program has become increasingly important to the counties over the last decade. Pitkin County received $555,514 through PILT in 2003. The 2013 amount is up 125 percent.

Garfield County received $2,825,294 through PILT for 2013. That is up nearly seven times from the $403,176 received last year.

Garfield County saw its PILT funds plummet starting in 2010 because of revenue sharing from mineral lease royalties. The federal government returns some of the funds it receives from oil and gas companies to the counties where federal lands are leased, and oil and gas are produced. The sharing of revenues was meant to offset additional costs counties were incurring from oil and gas activity, such as the need for new roads.

Garfield and Mesa counties made adjustments so that they aren’t direct recipients of mineral lease revenues anymore, according to Garfield County Commissioner Tom Jankovsky. Towns in the counties can still apply for grants via programs established through the revenue sharing. And by receiving fewer dollars through mineral lease revenue sharing, Garfield County received significantly more PILT funds, he said.

Jankovsky said Garfield County’s PILT money should be fairly stable for years to come. That’s assuming the program is maintained.

Bennet and Udall have tried to get PILT reauthorized for five years so the rural counties of Colorado have certainty about the funds, but Congress hasn’t gone along with the idea, according to a representative of Bennet’s office.

An announcement by the Department of Interior, which oversees the PILT program, indicated a long-term commitment is being sought.

“The president’s fiscal year 2014 budget proposes to extend mandatory full funding for the program for another year while a sustainable long-tern funding solution is developed for the PILT program,” the interior department said.

scondon@aspentimes.com


Start a dialogue, stay on topic and be civil.
If you don't follow the rules, your comment may be deleted.



News


See more