Raising nonresident hunting fees may reduce revenue | PostIndependent.com
YOUR AD HERE »

Raising nonresident hunting fees may reduce revenue

Dear Editor,

It has been brought to my attention that recent increases in nonresident license fees were responsible for a drop in the number of sportsmen coming to the state to enjoy these activities. Nonresident sportsmen have been a welcome source of tourist revenue for the state of Colorado; they spend money on food, lodging, gas and beverages. If the state thought “outside the box,” the fish and game people would consider reducing nonresident fees to less than the resident level.

Doing so could generate increased activity from out-of-state hunters. The revenue from products and services bought would greatly outweigh the small income realized from fewer nonresidents paying higher fees.



People who worry about such things as fish taken would do well to consider that the out-of-state fishermen might actually prefer catch and release as opposed to hauling the fish back home.

Sid Smock



Scottsdale, Ariz.


Support Local Journalism

Support Local Journalism

Readers around Glenwood Springs and Garfield County make the Post Independent’s work possible. Your financial contribution supports our efforts to deliver quality, locally relevant journalism.

Now more than ever, your support is critical to help us keep our community informed about the evolving coronavirus pandemic and the impact it is having locally. Every contribution, however large or small, will make a difference.

Each donation will be used exclusively for the development and creation of increased news coverage.

For tax deductible donations, click here.
 

Start a dialogue, stay on topic and be civil.
If you don't follow the rules, your comment may be deleted.

User Legend: iconModerator iconTrusted User


News

Report: Estimates of future Upper Colorado River Basin water use confound previous planning

A report released this month by the Center for Colorado River Studies says that in order to sustainably manage the river in the face of climate change, officials need alternative management paradigms and a different way of thinking compared with the status quo. Estimates about how much water the Upper Colorado River Basin states will use in the future are a problem that needs rethinking, according to the white paper.



See more