Red Table wilderness proposal falls far short | PostIndependent.com
YOUR AD HERE »

Red Table wilderness proposal falls far short

Dear Editor,

Although we are always excited when wilderness receives legislative attention, Representative McInnis’ Red Table Mountain Wilderness Proposal falls far short.

Eloquently defined in the 1964 Wilderness Act as a place where the “imprints of man are substantially unnoticeable,” the visionary concept of wilderness has been upheld for almost four decades. Wilderness is a place where people can explore the land in its natural condition, find solitude, escape the motorized mayhem of urbanized society, and recreate using human power.



Representative McInnis’ vision for wilderness includes motorized corridors for dirt bikes and ATVs (on routes that are closed to motorized use in the White River NF Plan!), helicopter landings and maneuvers, and streams starved for water.

No one benefits from “watering down” the Wilderness Act. Wilderness in name but not in fact is unacceptable. If Representative McInnis is not behind the idea of wilderness, then he should not propose it; if he is, then he should propose meaningful legislation that respects the concept of wilderness as firmly established in the Wilderness Act.



Sincerely,

Clare Bastable

Carbondal


Support Local Journalism

Support Local Journalism

Readers around Glenwood Springs and Garfield County make the Post Independent’s work possible. Your financial contribution supports our efforts to deliver quality, locally relevant journalism.

Now more than ever, your support is critical to help us keep our community informed about the evolving coronavirus pandemic and the impact it is having locally. Every contribution, however large or small, will make a difference.

Each donation will be used exclusively for the development and creation of increased news coverage.

 

Start a dialogue, stay on topic and be civil.
If you don't follow the rules, your comment may be deleted.

User Legend: iconModerator iconTrusted User