Referendum A promotes speculative water projects
“Whiskey is for drinking, and water is for fighting.” It’s an old Western saying that hasn’t been heard much for at least the past 25 years. But last summer’s drought changed all that. You need only to drive through a neighborhood on the Front Range, past the brown lawns, to know that the issue of water has gotten everyone’s attention.You’ll be hearing a lot about Referendum A leading into the fall. It’s a measure, if passed, that will allow the issuing of up to $2 billion dollars in bonds for local water districts, municipalities and private organizations to finance new water projects. On the surface this initiative makes sense, but dive deeper, past the good intentions, and you find more unanswered questions rather than solutions.It’s been said that water issues are 10 percent law and 90 percent politics, and politics is where this story begins. Referendum A began life as Senate Bill 236. It ‘s important to note that not one Western Slope senator (with one exception) or representative, Republican or Democrat would sign on to the bill. Worrying about protecting Eagle County’s watersheds from such a vague and open ended referendum that could affect Western Slope interests, I spent a week calling around the state to get the straight story from the people involved. I talked with the key groups that represent our interests: the Colorado River Water Conservation District, Colorado Water Conservation Board, the Water Quality and Quantity Board and Club 20. I also spoke at length with state Sen. Jack Taylor, R-Steamboat Springs, and state Rep. Carl Miller, D-Leadville.Over a dozen critical flaws were exposed, of which I will share some of the biggest:-These bonds may very well be rated with junk bond status. It’s important to know that financing for water projects is not a current problem. As stated earlier, water providers already have the ability to issue bonds themselves, and no project is being delayed because of lack of funding.-There is no legislative or public oversight. The referendum calls for the governor to start a water project by 2005, but no project under this $2 billion dollar plan ever comes back for legislative approval. These bonds are meant to be paid by user fee increases, which means that there will be no voter approval for increases that will inevitably come.-It’s writing a blank check to the government. The referendum does not specify any projects or how they would be picked. It takes time to responsibly evaluate the value of a water project. All the experts I spoke with said that the only projects that could be fast-tracked for a 2005 decision date would be highly speculative.-There is zero protection for transbasin diversion (pumping the water back to the Front Range), mitigation or compensation. All Western Slope elected officials are given a clear mandate on water when we sign up for our jobs – don’t allow water from the Western Slope be taken by the Front Range without mitigation or compensation.As a commissioner for Eagle County, my first duty is to protect the sufficiency of water and quality of our environment for all our residents. As a citizen of Colorado, I know that both Eastern and Western Slope interests need to work closely together to responsibly plan for the future. I think the last thing you want to hear from an elected official are the words “trust me.” I agree. Without any provision for oversight or accountability, Referendum A is a drinking binge that could leave generations to come with a very bad hangover.Arn Menconi is an Eagle County Commissioner. He can reached at (970) 328-8615 or by e-mail at Menconi@eagle-county.com.
Support Local Journalism
Support Local Journalism
Readers around Glenwood Springs and Garfield County make the Post Independent’s work possible. Your financial contribution supports our efforts to deliver quality, locally relevant journalism.
Now more than ever, your support is critical to help us keep our community informed about the evolving coronavirus pandemic and the impact it is having locally. Every contribution, however large or small, will make a difference.
Each donation will be used exclusively for the development and creation of increased news coverage.
Start a dialogue, stay on topic and be civil.
If you don't follow the rules, your comment may be deleted.
User Legend: Moderator Trusted User
Togetherness and celebration are two themes of International Women’s Day for Roaring Fork Valley residents
Editor’s note: We want to acknowledge that the women and girls featured in this story are not fully representative of the diversity within residents of the valley. We invite any story tips or leads about…