Ruedi water study draws attention of round-table oversight committee
Two proposed water studies are drawing attention from the Interbasin Compact Committee (IBCC) of the state Department of Natural Resources, which has said they could potentially harm established water rights. The IBCC oversees the nine river basin round tables created by House Bill 1177 to determine future water needs in each basin. IBCC spokesman Rick Brown told the Colorado River Basin Roundtable Monday in Glenwood Springs that he felt considerable “consternation” over the two studies by Grand County and the Ruedi Water and Power Authority to identify water needs. Data compiled by those studies, such as actual in-stream flows and the amount of water necessary to maintain a viable and healthy river ecosystem, could be used in future legal proceedings or for regulatory purposes that would prove harmful to “vested water rights,” Brown said. “It’s a hugely important issue.”Such an outcome would be contrary to the intent of HB 1177 not to impair previously established water rights.But a number of round-table members argued that the study in itself causes no harm.”A study doesn’t diminish a water right (in itself),” only a regulatory body can make that determination, said round-table member and Kremmling Mayor Tom Clark.Nor is it the intent to use such studies to cause harm. The intent of the Roaring Fork River study “is collaborative and cooperative,” said Ken Neubecker, who represents environmental interests to the round table.”If you take the worst case scenario to its logical conclusion,” said Mark Fuller, executive director of the Ruedi Authority and round-table member, every study or water project proposed by the basin round tables has the potential to impair someone’s water rights. “Everyone potentially violates the spirit of the legislation. And if it undermines the legitimacy of (the grant projects), it undermines the whole (round table) process.”John Redifer, a member of the Colorado Water Conservation Board (CWCB) – which grants funds for round-table projects – and representative to the round table, assured the group that he supported the two studies and would make his support known to the CWCB. He said the problem also lies with HB 1177. “It’s very poorly written legislation.”Brown also urged the group not to give up on the round-table project process, which involves people from all over the state with very divergent interests. “Don’t be discouraged,” he said.Contact Donna Gray: 945-8515, ext. firstname.lastname@example.orgPost Independent, Glenwood Springs Colorado CO
Support Local Journalism
Support Local Journalism
Each donation will be used exclusively for the development and creation of increased news coverage.
If you don't follow the rules, your comment may be deleted.
User Legend: Moderator Trusted User