Sheriffs Office, Martin see settlement as a victory |

Sheriffs Office, Martin see settlement as a victory

John Gardnerjgardner@postindependent.comGlenwood Springs, CO Colorado

GLENWOOD SPRINGS, Colorado The settlement in the Danny Martin case against Garfield County Sheriff Lou Vallario and a former Deputy Brandon Pariscoff was a victory for the Sheriff, according to attorney David Brougham of Hall and Evens LLC in Denver, representing Vallario.Absolutely its a victory for the defense, Brougham said Friday. Im glad (Martin) is happy. The guy walked away with almost nothing.According to Brougham, the settlement reached was for $10,000 to be paid to Martin through the Countys Insurance carrier. Martin initially asked for $100,000. Each of the parties involved are responsible for paying their respective court costs and attorneys fees. Brougham said that the $10,000 is much less than it would have cost Garfield County to take the action to trial.Vallario stated in an e-mail Friday that the settlement was a victory for him and the Sheriffs Office.This should send a message to any one else who thinks they can sue the Sheriffs Office with the intent of winning the lottery, Vallario said. We will not allow these ridiculous law suits to result in someone walking away with a handful of money. This settlement, contrary to Mr. Martins Attorney claims, is another victory for the Garfield County Sheriffs Office.The basis of Martins case, according to Brougham, focused on an incident between Martin and Pariscoff where Martin claimed to have suffered physical injuries after being Tased twice unnecessarily by Pariscoff during a 2006 traffic stop in Garfield County. The only claim linking Vallario to the case was a claim that Pariscoff was not properly trained by the Sheriffs Office, according to Brougham.(Vallario) didnt do anything wrong here anyway and his case would have been dismissed anyway, Brougham said, adding that, Martins attorney Anthony Viorst, Couldnt run away from this thing fast enough.Viorst said Thursday that the settlement was resolved to his, and Martins, satisfaction.According to a document filed on Feb. 19, 2009, the case was dismissed with prejudice, meaning that it cannot be re-filed.Martin filed the lawsuit in federal court in October 2008, nearly one year after Pariscoff was fired in November 2007, for reasons including allegations of dishonesty.Pariscoffs attorney Elliot Scott with Senter, Goldfarb & Rice, LLC in Denver didnt respond to requests for comment Thursday.Contact John Gardner:

Support Local Journalism

Support Local Journalism

Readers around Glenwood Springs and Garfield County make the Post Independent’s work possible. Your financial contribution supports our efforts to deliver quality, locally relevant journalism.

Now more than ever, your support is critical to help us keep our community informed about the evolving coronavirus pandemic and the impact it is having locally. Every contribution, however large or small, will make a difference.

Each donation will be used exclusively for the development and creation of increased news coverage.

For tax deductible donations, click here.

Start a dialogue, stay on topic and be civil.
If you don't follow the rules, your comment may be deleted.

User Legend: iconModerator iconTrusted User