Stein column: Legislators aren’t focused on right problem |

Stein column: Legislators aren’t focused on right problem

Rob Stein

Let me see if I can distract you from the real issue affecting our schools. Which of the following has the greatest influence on your child’s education?

a. Guns;

b. Corporal punishment; or

c. Teachers.

You guessed it.

On the other hand, which of the following bills is not being proposed by the state Legislature at the moment?

a. The right of teachers to bear arms in schools;

b. The right of teachers to paddle children; or

c. The right of teachers to earn a living wage.

That’s right. Your legislators are busy at work debating whether teachers should be keeping your kids safe by bringing firearms to work. They are also working hard to determine whether to outlaw corporal punishment, a practice about as common today as quill pens. But there is no serious proposal on the table to address the school finance crisis that is driving teachers from the profession and making the rest regret that they didn’t take their elders’ advice and find a future in plastics.

Last week, we informed our teachers that the fiscal environment in which our schools are operating is looking grim. In previous years, midyear salary increases were applied when funding increases exceeded the amount required for the fall increases to wages, retirement and health insurance. This year’s state budget situation does not allow for midyear cost of living increases.

Typically, 83 percent of school budgets go to salaries and benefits, so teacher wages are a direct effect of school funding. Colorado school funding is complicated by a unique blend of constitutional amendments that even somebody with a Ph.D. can’t figure out — believe me, I know — but their net effect is decreasing funding for schools.

According to the Colorado School Finance Project, Colorado ranks 40th in the nation in per-pupil spending and 47th in the nation in changes to school funding over the past decade. Colorado spends over $2,000 less per pupil than the national average and, when adjusted for inflation, $700 less than a decade ago.

Meanwhile, other costs have increased. Health insurance has gone up 45 percent over the past 10 years. This increase would have been much higher, but we have shifted more costs to employees; for example, the employee deductible has increased from $1,000 to $4,000 per year. The district’s contribution to PERA, the state retirement association, has increased 76 percent over the same time period. Our PERA contributions this year will be about $6.5 million, but would have been $3.7 million at 2006-07 rates — this has diverted $2.8 million from staff salaries to retirement contributions. Finally, as has been well-documented in our mountain communities (and reported in the Post Independent), housing costs are rising far faster than inflation, and turning our employees away.

In short, while Colorado school funding stagnates, teachers’ real wages decline.

Enter marijuana funding, another great distraction. Remember all those promises about marijuana taxes going to schools when the marijuana lobby was trying to get your vote? Well, according to the Colorado Department of Education, of the marijuana excise tax in Colorado, $40 million was slated for school facilities in 2016-17, and only $5.7 million went to public school funds that can be used for teacher salaries.

This school year in Colorado by comparison, voters approved $4.2 billion in bonds for school facilities, and the state general fund allocated $6.3 billion to schools. Put another way, marijuana taxes cover a thousandth of teachers’ wages in Colorado. It’s a much less regulated industry, so it’s hard to get precise data, but it appears that bake sales are contributing more to your child’s classroom than marijuana taxes are. Maybe we should hold more bake sales to raise teacher salaries.

Finally, let me try to divert your attention with charter school funding and vouchers. Two bills before the Legislature would drain funds from districts to increase funding for charter schools, or to allow families to get vouchers to attend private schools. Whether you are for or against them, these measures do nothing to increase the size of the pie, but simply pit one special interest against another as they fight over their slices.

What can we do? Thanks to the generosity of our taxpayers in the Roaring Fork Valley, we are in the process of building 55 units of affordable staff housing that will start being ready for occupancy in the fall. Because housing costs are a particular pain point in our communities, this should help some of our teachers and other staff members be able to stay and work in our schools. But affordable rental housing isn’t a comprehensive solution.

The real solution will take a herculean effort by our elected legislators to untangle the statewide fiscal knot and present a viable, bipartisan solution for the voters of Colorado to approve. Given the political climate at the national level these days, hope seems slim. So far, they are trying to keep themselves, and us, distracted with partisan issues that aren’t going to help our kids and teachers.

There is one bright spot. We are fortunate to have two legislators on the Joint Budget Committee who understand and care about education issues: our local representative, Bob Rankin, whose wife, Joyce, serves on the State Board of Education, and Rep. Millie Hamner from Summit County, a former school district superintendent. Let’s hope that they can keep their colleagues focused on finding a long-term solution to Colorado’s fiscal crisis. That’s the most important policy issue our legislators can support for our kids. Don’t let the other issues distract you.

Rob Stein is superintendent of the Roaring Fork School District.

Support Local Journalism

Support Local Journalism

Readers around Glenwood Springs and Garfield County make the Post Independent’s work possible. Your financial contribution supports our efforts to deliver quality, locally relevant journalism.

Now more than ever, your support is critical to help us keep our community informed about the evolving coronavirus pandemic and the impact it is having locally. Every contribution, however large or small, will make a difference.

Each donation will be used exclusively for the development and creation of increased news coverage.

For tax deductible donations, click here.

Start a dialogue, stay on topic and be civil.
If you don't follow the rules, your comment may be deleted.

User Legend: iconModerator iconTrusted User


Report: Estimates of future Upper Colorado River Basin water use confound previous planning

A report released this month by the Center for Colorado River Studies says that in order to sustainably manage the river in the face of climate change, officials need alternative management paradigms and a different way of thinking compared with the status quo. Estimates about how much water the Upper Colorado River Basin states will use in the future are a problem that needs rethinking, according to the white paper.

See more