Vail residents turn out to back Town Council against Vail Resorts
A number of residents Tuesday came to town hall to show support for the Vail Town Council’s decision to acquire by condemnation a parcel in East Vail.
The Vail Town Council kicks off every meeting with citizen participation, in which anyone can talk about anything that isn’t on that evening’s agenda. Those comments are usually brief, and cover a range of issues.
Location: Just north of the Interstate 70 interchange at East Vail
Owner: Vail Resorts
Size: 23.3 acres, with roughly 5.3 acres zoned for workforce housing
What’s proposed: A combination of rental housing and for-sale townhomes. Most of those homes would be deed restricted
The Vail Town Council has begun condemnation proceedings to buy the property
Tuesday’s comments had an overriding theme: the council’s condemnation action against Vail Resorts for the 23.3-acre parcel commonly known as Booth Heights. Several residents urged the council to stay strong in the process in the wake of Vail Resorts last week filing suit against the town to challenge the council’s Aug. 2 passage of an emergency ordinance that prevents issuing any work permits on the property.
Debbie King Ford, a longtime opponent of building housing on the site, said she’s hearing a “groundswell” of support from residents who want to financially support any town purchase of the property. King Ford said she believes a grassroots effort could “raise millions” to purchase the property.
Use the transfer tax
King Ford noted that the town’s real estate transfer tax was created to provide funding for open space purchases and improvements. The tax collects 1% of the price of every real estate transaction in the town.
Resident Kirsty Hinz took her time at the podium to encourage the council and to share a low opinion of Vail Resorts.
Hintz said she believes that the resort company’s claims about the Booth Heights site being about housing “is a load of hogwash.”
Resident Richard Leslie said his legal career included arguments before the U.S. Supreme Court. Leslie, offering “free” legal advice, told council members “You’re the good guys,” in the dispute.
Leslie claimed Vail Resorts has an opportunity to “do a really good thing” in the dispute by agreeing to sell the parcel.
Longtime resident Merv Lapin said Vail Resorts and its corporate predecessor, Vail Associates, for the past 56 years have had the opportunity to build housing in the community, and it hasn’t happened.
‘We’ve let them get away with it’
“We’ve let them get away with it,” Lapin said, adding he believes the town should also begin condemnation proceedings against Vail Resorts for the Ever Vail parcel, for parking, as well as the land under the Lionshead parking structure and Vail Health Hospital.
Lapin noted that if the hospital should go away, for whatever reason, the land would revert to Vail Resorts.
Mark Gordon, a resident and former council member who signed a recent letter urging fiscal restraint in acquiring the parcel, said the public needs to be involved in the resolution of the dispute.
Gordon urged the council to put the acquisition of the parcel to a town vote once a sale price is determined.
That vote would let the council “know without a doubt where the citizens are” on the matter.
Gordon acknowledged that residents can’t force a referendum, but council members can put the matter to the public with a four-person majority.
“Let’s have that discussion and that vote,” Gordon said.
Support Local Journalism
Support Local Journalism
Readers around Glenwood Springs and Garfield County make the Post Independent’s work possible. Your financial contribution supports our efforts to deliver quality, locally relevant journalism.
Now more than ever, your support is critical to help us keep our community informed about the evolving coronavirus pandemic and the impact it is having locally. Every contribution, however large or small, will make a difference.
Each donation will be used exclusively for the development and creation of increased news coverage.