Your Letters | PostIndependent.com
YOUR AD HERE »

Your Letters

It is time to just say “no” to the elusive, if persistent, notion of a Glenwood Springs bypass.

It is time, instead, to talk about real solutions for reducing traffic and traffic impacts in this otherwise charmed and healthy community.

The ill-conceived and simplistic idea of putting so-called through-traffic onto a second highway corridor just cannot fit in a town that is only seven blocks wide to begin with.



While bypasses (truck routes, commuter routes or other such concepts) have had some positive effects in other towns, those places actually had the space to make such routes work. We don’t.

The latest version of the bypass fad suggests putting a new highway along the eastern bank of the Roaring Fork River. Such a structure would destroy the charm and availability of that remarkable natural corridor, which so defines the attractiveness of our community.



That in addition to bulldozing or rendering uninhabitable a dozen homes and destroying the livability of neighborhoods like Polo Park, the area around Glenwood Elementary School, and homes on the west side of the river.

What’s more, it just won’t work.

Legitimate and long-standing Grand Avenue complaints include too much traffic, vehicles that are too large, too much noise, and too much grit and pollution. Moving some of that traffic four blocks away would leave the same impacts embedded in our neighborhoods – along two routes.

Unless deliberate, affirmative and creative approaches are taken to reduce per-capita traffic, Grand Avenue would end up just as full and annoying as ever, joined by a twin mess along the river.

The currently proposed “Highway 82 Access Plan” includes some questionable ideas that are not friendly to pedestrians or to local drivers. Those portions should be eliminated or modified, and no such plan should further sacrifice Grand Avenue to excess traffic.

However, the alternative to such schemes, and the path to stopping the negative impacts of one highway in our midst, is not the building of a second highway only blocks away.

Let’s drop the ineffective bypass distraction and focus instead on real, regionally wise, community-serving solutions that actually work.

Steve Smith

Glenwood Springs

In the March 17 Post Independent Letters to the Editor, Mr. Carl Heck thought if not for the cardinals there might have been a Pope Romney to head the Roman Catholic Church. That would be better than what we got in our last election. Sometimes you are the hammer, sometimes the thumb.

Jack E. Blankenship

Battlement Mesa

Bypass, bypass, bypass. Once CDOT gets their Grand Avenue access plan, they have their bypass, and it’s Grand Avenue.

Jimmy Moore

Glenwood Springs


Support Local Journalism

Support Local Journalism

Readers around Glenwood Springs and Garfield County make the Post Independent’s work possible. Your financial contribution supports our efforts to deliver quality, locally relevant journalism.

Now more than ever, your support is critical to help us keep our community informed about the evolving coronavirus pandemic and the impact it is having locally. Every contribution, however large or small, will make a difference.

Each donation will be used exclusively for the development and creation of increased news coverage.

For tax deductible donations, click here.
 

Start a dialogue, stay on topic and be civil.
If you don't follow the rules, your comment may be deleted.

User Legend: iconModerator iconTrusted User


News

Report: Estimates of future Upper Colorado River Basin water use confound previous planning

A report released this month by the Center for Colorado River Studies says that in order to sustainably manage the river in the face of climate change, officials need alternative management paradigms and a different way of thinking compared with the status quo. Estimates about how much water the Upper Colorado River Basin states will use in the future are a problem that needs rethinking, according to the white paper.



See more