Guest opinion: Don’t rig the bar for citizen initiatives
Do you like the fact that Colorado politicians must ask us first before they raise our taxes or debt? They sure don’t like it.
Our Taxpayer’s Bill of Rights (TABOR) became law only through our citizen initiative process. Amendment 71 destroys that very process.
Do you like that our elected officials are term limited? Are bound by ethics laws? Have to do their work transparently? Can’t use tax money to pay for abortions?
None of these reforms would have happened if Amendment 71 was in place. So it’s no wonder the political establishment loves this proposed scheme. It takes away our power to rein them in.
That’s also why 71 is opposed by diverse groups like Colorado Campaign for Life, the Colorado Union of Taxpayers, the Colorado Firearms Association, the TABOR Committee, tea parties, GOP parties, the Independence Institute and even liberal groups like Common Cause.
Amendment 71 is not Raising a Bar. It’s rigging a system.
Anyone who says it’s too easy to change the Colorado Constitution has either never tried or is wildly wealthy. And anyone who compares our state constitution to the U.S. Constitution is disingenuous, comparing apples and oranges to shock voters. Colorado’s constitution is actually shorter than that of most other states.
Reforms that we want, but politicians hate, sometimes need to be placed in the state constitution so politicians can’t repeal them without a public vote from us, the people.
Yes, it should be harder to amend the state constitution than it is to change state statutes. Absolutely. But that can be done in a number of ways, like differentiating the number of signatures required between statutory and constitutional changes. There’s no need to destroy our right to petition government.
Just how destructive is 71? So much so the proponents knew they couldn’t reach their own damn bar. They refused to write their measure so it would take effect only if they got the 55 percent supermajority of the public vote, as their proposal would require of us.
But double standards for political insiders are hardly new.
Amendment 71 makes it nearly impossible to even get an amendment on the ballot in the first place. It requires us to gather most petition signatures in each of Colorado’s 35 far-flung Senate districts. This has never been done before, and so expensive it may never be done. Even the proponents of 71 refuse to prove they’ve done it, because they haven’t.
Amendment 71 is an invitation for legal mayhem. Imagine the 35 different sets of lawsuits, at least one for each Senate district, over any proposed amendment — a heyday for lawyers.
Amendment 71 permits the people in one area of the state to hold the whole state hostage. Should the people in Boulder stop a reform the rest of the state demands because it’s virtually impossible to get enough valid signatures there?
It’s crucial to know that 71 came out of the well-funded effort to destroy TABOR, “Build a Better Colorado.” Under this plan it would be impossible to strengthen TABOR, because it would require a supermajority vote. But under 71 they can repeal TABOR with a simple majority vote.
You read that right.
Don’t Rig the Bar. Vote no.
Jon Caldara is president of the Independence Institute, a free-market think tank in Denver.
Support Local Journalism
Support Local Journalism
Readers around Glenwood Springs and Garfield County make the Post Independent’s work possible. Your financial contribution supports our efforts to deliver quality, locally relevant journalism.
Now more than ever, your support is critical to help us keep our community informed about the evolving coronavirus pandemic and the impact it is having locally. Every contribution, however large or small, will make a difference.
Each donation will be used exclusively for the development and creation of increased news coverage.
Start a dialogue, stay on topic and be civil.
If you don't follow the rules, your comment may be deleted.
User Legend: Moderator Trusted User
How you handle stress is important. At YouthZone, we’ve seen kids facing both real and perceived pressures that they are often not equipped to handle.